Muse Wonder: Meta pricing, API and benchmarks vs Opus 5.5 and GPT-6 Astra

Meta launched Muse Wonder and Muse Wonder Full on 12 Oct 2026. Here's Meta's full comparison sheet, what Wonder costs on the API ($4/$20 per million tokens), why Wonder Full is Muse Code-only, and what works from Hungary and the EU.

~5 min read

Muse Wonder Meta: $4 / $20 per 1M tokens, API and Muse Code, vs Opus 5.5 and GPT-6 Astra
Muse Wonder is Meta's new frontier model for coding, long-running agents and computer use, launched 12 Oct 2026. It's on Meta Model API as muse-wonder-1.0 at $4 / $20 per million input/output tokens with a 1M-token context. The stronger Muse Wonder Full is only in Muse Code's $50 and $200 plans.

This is an AI news briefing, not a hands-on review. Meta shipped Muse Wonder on Monday, 12 October; I checked the launch post, model card and Model API docs against what I already covered on Muse Spark and Muse Code pricing. If you only need price, availability and Meta's own score sheet, this page is the short version.

What is Muse Wonder?

Muse Wonder is a series of two models: Muse Wonder and Muse Wonder Full. Meta calls them its most capable models yet, aimed at "personal and professional agentic tasks", and says they were trained at its gigawatt-scale Prometheus data center. Per the model card, both take text, image, video and audio input, return text, and handle 1M tokens of context (the API docs list 1,048,576 tokens, plus PDF input and reasoning effort from minimal to max).

Meta frames two ideas around it: Active Memory, carrying important context about you across conversations and pulling it back when it's relevant, and Active Focus, sticking with a hard goal by trying alternatives, working through blockers, asking for clarification and checking in before important actions.

What Muse Wonder can do

Muse Wonder benchmarks: Meta's comparison sheet

This is Meta's full evaluation table from the launch post, transcribed cell by cell. Meta compares Muse Wonder Full and Muse Wonder against Claude Fable 5.1, GPT-6 Astra and Claude Opus 5.5, all at max reasoning effort. Every number here is Meta-reported; the model card says some come from third parties (Artificial Analysis, Vals AI, Surge) and that Meta's own competitor runs are "best-effort".

Meta-reported results from the Muse Wonder announcement (12 Oct 2026). Green = highest score in the row. OSWorld V2.1 shows partial reward / strict binary completion; Meta lists no binary figure for Claude Opus 5.5. Muse Wonder Full's SWE-Marathon score is at xhigh effort.
BenchmarkMuse Wonder Full (max)Muse Wonder (max)Claude Fable 5.1 (max)GPT-6 Astra (max)Claude Opus 5.5 (max)
Personal and professional agents
Personal Superintelligence Index
Internal composite of personal and knowledge work
59.154.349.954.555.2
Harvey LAB-AA
Legal agent work
13.110.06.48.64.2
Vals Finance Agent V2
Financial analyst research
59.156.658.953.558.6
HealthBench Pro
Open-ended health queries
62.360.562.165.365.6
AutomationBench-AA
E2E business workflows
45.439.132.141.641.2
GDP.pdf
Professional work
33.230.827.634.230.6
JobBench
Professional tool use
75.370.573.166.175.4
OSWorld V2.1
Agentic computer use (partial / binary)
78.4 / 39.472.6 / 34.380.7 / 43.175.8 / 34.381.8 / –
MemoryBench
Remembering context
85.585.679.081.481.5
Coding
Terminal-Bench 4.0-AA
Agentic terminal coding
57.152.052.059.159.6
DeepSWE 1.1
Long horizon coding
79.078.867.474.174.2
SWE-Marathon
Ultra-long horizon engineering
57.5 (xhigh)53.145.642.546.3
ProgramBench
From scratch programming
59.050.055.552.570.5
General
Artificial Analysis Index5652535358

How I read it: Wonder Full wins most clearly on long coding work (SWE-Marathon 57.5, DeepSWE 79.0) and agent workflows (AutomationBench-AA 45.4, Harvey LAB-AA 13.1). Claude Opus 5.5 still leads on ProgramBench (70.5 vs 59.0), Terminal-Bench and OSWorld, and tops the Artificial Analysis Index at 58. The regular Muse Wonder, the one you can actually call over the API, lands close to Opus 5.5 rather than above it on most rows.

Muse Wonder pricing and availability (including the EU and Hungary)

From Hungary and the EU: Meta's Model API Geographic Use Policy, updated on launch day, lists no EU country among its restricted territories, and its only model-specific block is Muse Image in India. Muse Wonder and Wonder Full have no country restriction. The catch: Meta says access exists only where it has enabled it, and it doesn't publish a full allow-list. The model card also names Meta Platforms Ireland Limited as a model provider alongside Meta Platforms, Inc.

Muse Wonder for vibe coders and indie builders

Fast path by where you already sit (docs-based — I have not run Wonder on a private repo yet):

How this fits prior VCL posts

Muse Wonder FAQ

What is Muse Wonder?

Muse Wonder is Meta's most capable model family, launched on 12 October 2026 by Meta's research team. It comes in two variants, Muse Wonder and Muse Wonder Full, built for coding, long-running agents and computer use. Both take text, image, video, audio and PDF input, return text, and have a 1M-token context window.

How much does Muse Wonder cost?

On Meta Model API, Muse Wonder (muse-wonder-1.0) costs $4.00 per million input tokens, $0.20 per million cached input tokens and $20.00 per million output tokens. Muse Wonder Full has no per-token price: it comes with the Muse Code Power Usage plan ($50 a month) and Maximum Usage plan ($200 a month).

What is the difference between Muse Wonder and Muse Wonder Full?

Muse Wonder Full is the higher-capability variant and scores higher on most of Meta's benchmarks, for example 59.1 vs 54.3 on Meta's Personal Superintelligence Index. Muse Wonder is on the API and in every Muse Code plan; Wonder Full is only in Muse Code on the Power and Maximum plans. Setting reasoning effort to max on Muse Wonder doesn't switch you to Full.

Is Muse Wonder better than Claude Opus 5.5?

On Meta's own comparison sheet, Muse Wonder Full beats Claude Opus 5.5 on 8 of 14 rows, including SWE-Marathon (57.5 vs 46.3) and DeepSWE 1.1 (79.0 vs 74.2). Opus 5.5 leads on HealthBench Pro, JobBench, OSWorld V2.1, Terminal-Bench 4.0-AA, ProgramBench and the Artificial Analysis Index. These are Meta-reported numbers, so test on your own tasks.

Is Muse Wonder available in the EU and Hungary?

Meta's Model API Geographic Use Policy (updated 12 Oct 2026) doesn't list Hungary or any EU country among its restricted territories, and Muse Wonder has no model-specific country restriction. Meta also says the API is only available where it has enabled access, without publishing a full country list. Meta hasn't said which countries get Muse Wonder inside the Muse app.

Is Muse Wonder free?

No. As of October 2026 Muse Wonder is a paid model: pay-as-you-go on Meta Model API or through a Muse Code plan. Meta's docs say Contributor mode, which trades your content for training in exchange for more usage, isn't available for Muse Wonder on pay-as-you-go. Muse Code subscribers get Contributor mode on by default and can switch it off.

Want AI news without the hype? I verify every launch against the provider's own pages. Subscribe to the VCL newsletter for the Tuesday and Friday guides, and grab my most-read free guide: free AI API keys for vibe coding in 2026.

Source: Meta AI Research: Muse Wonder (12 Oct 2026). Benchmark figures are Meta-reported. Docs-only — no hands-on Muse Wonder run yet.

Disclosure: no paid placement. None of the links in this post are referral links.

Questions? Get in touch — or subscribe for the next AI news post.

← All posts